Institution record
LMAX Group
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in the united states and canada) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCATier-1 Financial Conduct Authority | 783200 | Regulated | 783200 | 2017-12-15 | |
FSPRTier-1 Financial Service Providers Register | FSP612509 | Regulated | LMAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED | 2018-05-24 | |
CYSECTier-2 Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | 310/16 | Regulated | LMAX Broker Europe Ltd | 2016-08-08 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing LMAX Group against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in the united states and canada dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMAX Group (this record) | FCAFSPRCYSEC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CANADA | FINTRACFinCENASIC+8 | 3 / 11 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Doo Prime | FINRASECFCA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| OANDA | IIROCNFAASIC+3 | 6 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| StoneX | SECNFAMAS+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CEX.IO | FinCENFINTRACFCA+1 | 2 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
LMAX Group: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is LMAX Group's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, LMAX Group (legal entity reference: LMAX Group) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) — licence 783200, status: regulated, Tier-1; FSPR (Financial Service Providers Register) — licence FSP612509, status: regulated, Tier-1; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 310/16, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FCA, FSPR, CYSEC public register.
Which of LMAX Group's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
LMAX Group is registered at Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM and tracked under our institutions licensed in the united states and canada scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 3 recorded licences (FCA, FSPR, CYSEC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is LMAX Group's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
LMAX Group carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to LMAX Group's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with LMAX Group, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FCA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from AlphaPulse Finance relevant to LMAX Group's supervisory scope.
market-insights
Federal Reserve Board finalizes changes to enhance the transparency and public accountability of its stress test and reduce volatility in its stress test-related capital requirements — AlphaPulse Finance Market Brief
Federal Reserve Board finalizes changes to enhance the transparency and public accountability of its stress test and reduce volatility in its stress test-related capital requirements: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
market-insights
Federal Reserve Board announces approval of application by Fleur Capital Corporation — AlphaPulse Finance Market Brief
Federal Reserve Board announces approval of application by Fleur Capital Corporation: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.
Market Microstructure & Systematic Alpha
US & European Equity Market Microstructure in 2026: SEC Rule 605 Modernization, T+1 Settlement Liquidity Physics, and Systematic Execution Alpha
An empirical 2026 institutional research dossier examining SEC Rule 605 execution quality disclosures, DTCC NSCC T+1 margin reductions, tick-size regime shifts, and cross-venue systematic implementation shortfall across US NMS and European MiFID II dark/lit venues.
Central Bank Policy & Macro Rates
Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) Clearing Mechanics, TGA Rebuild Elasticity & SOFR-IORB Spread Dynamics (Q4 2026)
The Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) refers to the permanent overnight liquidity backstop administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that caps secured U.S. dollar funding rates by lending cash against U.S. Treasury and Agency securities at the top of the FOMC target range [4.50%, Federal Reserve H.15 Release, October 2026]. As the U.S. Treasury General Account (TGA) rebuilds toward its $850 billion cash target [$850 billion, U.S. Treasury Quarterly Refunding Estimate, Q4 2026] and Overnight Reverse Repo (ON RRP) balances approach structural exhaustion at $142 billion [$142 billion, NY Fed Markets Desk Data, October 2026], commercial bank reserves bear 72% of incremental fiscal liquidity drain, driving episodic SOFR-IORB spread inversions on Treasury auction settlement dates.