Skip to content
Thursday, October 22, 2026RSS
AlphaPulse Finance

Institution record

Gate.io

Risk level not supplied9 of 9 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in the united states and canada) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
DMCCTier-2
Dubai Multi Commodities Centre
Number pending checkRegulatedGATE MENA DMCC—
GFSCTier-2
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission
121003RegulatedHippo Capital Co Limited2021-09-04
MFSATier-2
Malta Financial Services Authority
C 89337RegulatedGATE TECHNOLOGY LTD2018-11-12
OAMTier-3
Organismo Agenti e Mediatori
PSV83RegulatedGate Italy S.R.L2022-12-22
ASICTier-1
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
659 401 617RegulatedGATE INFORMATION PTY LTD2022-05-13
OAMTier-3
Organismo Agenti e Mediatori
Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MTRegulatedGate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT2024-02-27
CRTier-3
Companies Registry(Registrar of Companies, HKSAR)
TC008572RegulatedHippo Financial Services Limited—
SECRTier-3
State Enterprise Centre of Registers
306068986RegulatedGate Global UAB2022-05-12
SCBOffshore
Securities Commission of The Bahamas
Number pending checkRegulatedGATE GLOBAL LIMITED2025-02-28

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Gate.io against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in the united states and canada dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Gate.io (this record)
DMCCGFSCMFSA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—0
Robinhood
FINRASECSEC+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—0
TradeZero
IIROCSECFINRA+1
3 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
CANADA
FINTRACFinCENASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
OKX
SECFinCENFSA+6
9 / 9Risk level not supplied—1
eToro
FINRASECFCA+5
6 / 8Risk level not supplied—0

Gate.io: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Gate.io's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Gate.io (legal entity reference: Gate.io) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; GFSC (Gibraltar Financial Services Commission) — licence 121003, status: regulated, Tier-2; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence C 89337, status: regulated, Tier-2; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence PSV83, status: regulated, Tier-3; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 659 401 617, status: regulated, Tier-1; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT, status: regulated, Tier-3; CR (Companies Registry(Registrar of Companies, HKSAR)) — licence TC008572, status: regulated, Tier-3; SECR (State Enterprise Centre of Registers) — licence 306068986, status: regulated, Tier-3; SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DMCC, GFSC, MFSA public register.

Which of Gate.io's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Gate.io is tracked under our institutions licensed in the united states and canada coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (DMCC, GFSC, MFSA, OAM, ASIC, CR, SECR, SCB) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Gate.io's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Gate.io carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Gate.io's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Gate.io (listed execution software: Gate.io:Trade BTC & ETH), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (gate.it) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DMCC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from AlphaPulse Finance relevant to Gate.io's supervisory scope.

All research →

market-insights

Federal Reserve Board announces enforcement action against American Express Company to address, among other things, the firm’s failure to sufficiently detect and report certain suspicious activity related to money laundering — AlphaPulse Finance Market Brief

Federal Reserve Board announces enforcement action against American Express Company to address, among other things, the firm’s failure to sufficiently detect and report certain suspicious activity related to money laundering: Summary of the supplied material covering no source facts provided. Source details have not been independently verified.

Read briefing →

Market Microstructure & Systematic Alpha

US & European Equity Market Microstructure in 2026: SEC Rule 605 Modernization, T+1 Settlement Liquidity Physics, and Systematic Execution Alpha

An empirical 2026 institutional research dossier examining SEC Rule 605 execution quality disclosures, DTCC NSCC T+1 margin reductions, tick-size regime shifts, and cross-venue systematic implementation shortfall across US NMS and European MiFID II dark/lit venues.

Read briefing →

Central Bank Policy & Macro Rates

Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) Clearing Mechanics, TGA Rebuild Elasticity & SOFR-IORB Spread Dynamics (Q4 2026)

The Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) refers to the permanent overnight liquidity backstop administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that caps secured U.S. dollar funding rates by lending cash against U.S. Treasury and Agency securities at the top of the FOMC target range [4.50%, Federal Reserve H.15 Release, October 2026]. As the U.S. Treasury General Account (TGA) rebuilds toward its $850 billion cash target [$850 billion, U.S. Treasury Quarterly Refunding Estimate, Q4 2026] and Overnight Reverse Repo (ON RRP) balances approach structural exhaustion at $142 billion [$142 billion, NY Fed Markets Desk Data, October 2026], commercial bank reserves bear 72% of incremental fiscal liquidity drain, driving episodic SOFR-IORB spread inversions on Treasury auction settlement dates.

Read briefing →

Central Bank Policy & Macro Rates

FOMC 3.75%–4.00% Rate Corridor, Post-QT Reserve Management & Treasury Buyback Liquidity Analysis

The FOMC holds the federal funds target range at 3.75%–4.00% in October 2026 while stabilizing bank reserves at $3.12 trillion via T-bill Reserve Management Purchases and $4B Treasury buybacks.

Read briefing →
Gate.io — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | AlphaPulse Finance