Institution record
StoneX One
StoneX Financial Inc.
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed in the united states and canada) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage National Futures Association | 0501390 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 | |
In our coverage U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 | |
Financial Conduct Authority Financial Conduct Authority | 446717 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Ltd | 2010 | |
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 345646 | Regulated | City Index Australia Pty Ltd | 2014 | |
MAS Monetary Authority of Singapore | Not supplied | Regulated | StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. | 2011 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing StoneX One against peer institutions in our institutions licensed in the united states and canada dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StoneX One (this record) | NFAU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Financial Conduct Authority+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Robinhood | NFANYSDFSSecurities Investor Protection Corporation (U.S. SIPC)+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | 7.3 | 0 |
| FMBM | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (U.S. FDIC)Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed)+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
| TradeZero | IIROCFINRAU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| OANDA | NFAIIROCMAS+3 | 6 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 9.1 | 0 |
| eToro | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)FINRAFinancial Services Regulatory Authority, Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM FSRA)+5 | 6 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | 7.5 | 0 |
StoneX One: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is StoneX One's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, StoneX One (legal entity reference: StoneX Financial Inc.) holds 5 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 5 are marked regulated or registered: NFA (National Futures Association) — licence 0501390, status: regulated; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — licence CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 446717, status: regulated; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 345646, status: regulated; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official NFA, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Conduct Authority public register.
Which of StoneX One's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on institutions licensed in the united states and canada. 2 of StoneX One's 5 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: NFA (licence 0501390, regulated, entity: StoneX Financial Inc.); U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (licence CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179, regulated, entity: StoneX Financial Inc.). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is StoneX One's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
StoneX One carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to StoneX One's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with StoneX One, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (stonex.co) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to NFA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from AlphaPulse Finance relevant to StoneX One's supervisory scope.
Market Microstructure & Systematic Alpha
US & European Equity Market Microstructure in 2026: SEC Rule 605 Modernization, T+1 Settlement Liquidity Physics, and Systematic Execution Alpha
An empirical 2026 institutional research dossier examining SEC Rule 605 execution quality disclosures, DTCC NSCC T+1 margin reductions, tick-size regime shifts, and cross-venue systematic implementation shortfall across US NMS and European MiFID II dark/lit venues.
Central Bank Policy & Macro Rates
Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) Clearing Mechanics, TGA Rebuild Elasticity & SOFR-IORB Spread Dynamics (Q4 2026)
The Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility (SRF) refers to the permanent overnight liquidity backstop administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that caps secured U.S. dollar funding rates by lending cash against U.S. Treasury and Agency securities at the top of the FOMC target range [4.50%, Federal Reserve H.15 Release, October 2026]. As the U.S. Treasury General Account (TGA) rebuilds toward its $850 billion cash target [$850 billion, U.S. Treasury Quarterly Refunding Estimate, Q4 2026] and Overnight Reverse Repo (ON RRP) balances approach structural exhaustion at $142 billion [$142 billion, NY Fed Markets Desk Data, October 2026], commercial bank reserves bear 72% of incremental fiscal liquidity drain, driving episodic SOFR-IORB spread inversions on Treasury auction settlement dates.
market-insights
Federal Reserve and FDIC Publish Resolution Plan Feedback Letters for 15 Banking Organizations
Agencies publish resolution plan feedback letters for 15 banking organizations: Summary of the supplied material covering no source facts provided. Source details have not been independently verified.
market-insights
Federal Reserve Board finalizes changes to enhance the transparency and public accountability of its stress test and reduce volatility in its stress test-related capital requirements — AlphaPulse Finance Market Brief
Federal Reserve Board finalizes changes to enhance the transparency and public accountability of its stress test and reduce volatility in its stress test-related capital requirements: Summary of the supplied material covering SFC, FCA. Source details have not been independently verified.