1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fidelity International vs LINK IO: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fidelity International (Fidelity International) and LINK IO (LINK Finance Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- Fidelity International 6D Score
- 5.0
- LINK IO 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Fidelity International outranks LINK IO by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fidelity International holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LINK IO holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fidelity International | LINK IO | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Fidelity International |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Fidelity International |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Fidelity International |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Fidelity International |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Fidelity International |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fidelity International vs LINK IO
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fidelity International | LINK IO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fidelity International | LINK Finance Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Beech Gate, Millfield Lane, Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 6RP。 | GB |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Wealth management, Stocks, Funds | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fidelity International and LINK IO against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fidelity International vs LINK IO
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fidelity International or LINK IO?
Both Fidelity International and LINK IO hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Fidelity International maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LINK IO maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fidelity International and LINK IO?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fidelity International records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with LINK IO at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Fidelity International and LINK IO differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fidelity International lists Wealth management, Stocks, Funds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while LINK IO lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fidelity International or LINK IO?
Fidelity International carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LINK IO carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.