1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FireflyEX vs X Open Hub: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FireflyEX (FireflyEX) and X Open Hub (XTB Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- FireflyEX 6D Score
- 7.0
- X Open Hub 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FireflyEX outranks X Open Hub by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FireflyEX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas X Open Hub holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FireflyEX | X Open Hub | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FireflyEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FireflyEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | FireflyEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FireflyEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FireflyEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FireflyEX vs X Open Hub
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FireflyEX | X Open Hub |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FireflyEX | XTB Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | DCr 51MCOL0RAD0 20 60204 | Level 9, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, E14 5AA, London, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrency trading, contract trading, fiat currency trading. Leverage trading | FX, indices, commodities, stocks and etf, cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | xoh trader, MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Turkish, Vietnamese, English, Japanese, Korean, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FireflyEX and X Open Hub against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FireflyEX vs X Open Hub
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FireflyEX or X Open Hub?
Both FireflyEX and X Open Hub hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FireflyEX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas X Open Hub maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FireflyEX and X Open Hub?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FireflyEX records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with X Open Hub at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FireflyEX and X Open Hub differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FireflyEX lists Cryptocurrency trading, contract trading, fiat currency trading. Leverage trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while X Open Hub lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks and etf, cryptocurrencies with execution software [xoh trader, MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FireflyEX or X Open Hub?
FireflyEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while X Open Hub carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.