1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Guardian Audits vs HashEx: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Guardian Audits (Guardian Audits) and HashEx (HashEx) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- Guardian Audits 6D Score
- 5.0
- HashEx 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Guardian Audits and HashEx are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Guardian Audits holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas HashEx holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Guardian Audits | HashEx | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Guardian Audits vs HashEx
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Guardian Audits | HashEx |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Guardian Audits | HashEx |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Smart contract audit, security assessment, risk assessment, continuous monitoring and support, community knowledge sharing | Smart contract audit, security consulting, security monitoring and response, code optimization |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Guardian Audits and HashEx against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Guardian Audits vs HashEx
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Guardian Audits or HashEx?
Both Guardian Audits and HashEx hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Guardian Audits maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas HashEx maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Guardian Audits and HashEx?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Guardian Audits records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with HashEx at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Guardian Audits and HashEx differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Guardian Audits lists Smart contract audit, security assessment, risk assessment, continuous monitoring and support, community knowledge sharing with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while HashEx lists Smart contract audit, security consulting, security monitoring and response, code optimization with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Guardian Audits or HashEx?
Guardian Audits carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while HashEx carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.