1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Interactive Design vs Magic Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Interactive Design (Interactive Design LLC) and Magic Wallet (Magic Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- Interactive Design 6D Score
- 5.0
- Magic Wallet 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Interactive Design and Magic Wallet are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Interactive Design holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Interactive Design | Magic Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Interactive Design vs Magic Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Interactive Design | Magic Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interactive Design LLC | Magic Wallet |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1 Meta Way, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States of America | 1390 Mission Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94103 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | based on network identity verification and wallets |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Interactive Design and Magic Wallet against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Interactive Design vs Magic Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Interactive Design or Magic Wallet?
Both Interactive Design and Magic Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Interactive Design maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Interactive Design and Magic Wallet?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Interactive Design records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Magic Wallet at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Interactive Design and Magic Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Interactive Design lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Magic Wallet lists based on network identity verification and wallets with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Interactive Design or Magic Wallet?
Interactive Design carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.