Skip to content
AlphaPulse Finance
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

MEXC vs Tiger Brokers: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MEXC (MEXC) and Tiger Brokers (UP Fintech Holding Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada

MEXC 6D Score
5.5
Tiger Brokers 6D Score
6.8
Regulated Licences
4 vs 4
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mexc-vs-tiger-brokers

Tiger Brokers outranks MEXC by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.8 vs 5.5)

On supervisory breadth, MEXC holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tiger Brokers holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMEXCTiger BrokersScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.56.8+1.3Tiger Brokers
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.76.4+0.7Tiger Brokers
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0Tiger Brokers
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.37.2+1.9Tiger Brokers
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.47.0+1.6Tiger Brokers

Visual Architecture Benchmark: MEXC vs Tiger Brokers

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: MEXC vs Tiger Brokers
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between MEXC and Tiger Brokers.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMEXCTiger Brokers
Primary Legal NameMEXCUP Fintech Holding Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressKeemia tn 4, Kristiine linnaosa, Tallinn, Harju maakond, 10616US
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment productsStock trading, asset management, wealth management, investor education
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Arabic, Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, Japanese, Korean, FrenchChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare MEXC and Tiger Brokers against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: MEXC vs Tiger Brokers

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MEXC or Tiger Brokers?

Both MEXC and Tiger Brokers hold 4 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MEXC maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tiger Brokers maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (FINRA, ASIC, MAS, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MEXC and Tiger Brokers?

In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MEXC records an Overall Score of 5.5 (Risk & Licensing: 5.7, Brand: 5.3, Market Influence: 5.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Tiger Brokers at 6.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.4, Brand: 7.2, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do MEXC and Tiger Brokers differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

MEXC lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tiger Brokers lists Stock trading, asset management, wealth management, investor education with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MEXC or Tiger Brokers?

MEXC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tiger Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

MEXC vs Tiger Brokers (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | AlphaPulse Finance