1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
SCDEX vs Tiger Brokers: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) and Tiger Brokers (UP Fintech Holding Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- SCDEX 6D Score
- 9.3
- Tiger Brokers 6D Score
- 6.8
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 4
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SCDEX outranks Tiger Brokers by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.8)
On supervisory breadth, SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tiger Brokers holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | SCDEX | Tiger Brokers | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 9.3 | 6.8 | +2.5 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 9.5 | 6.4 | +3.1 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 9.3 | 4.0 | +5.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 9.2 | 0.0 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 9.4 | 7.2 | +2.2 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 9.1 | 7.0 | +2.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: SCDEX vs Tiger Brokers
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | SCDEX | Tiger Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE | UP Fintech Holding Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Low risk | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances | Stock trading, asset management, wealth management, investor education |
| Execution Software & Terminals | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare SCDEX and Tiger Brokers against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: SCDEX vs Tiger Brokers
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SCDEX or Tiger Brokers?
Tiger Brokers holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, SCDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tiger Brokers maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (FINRA, ASIC, MAS, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SCDEX and Tiger Brokers?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SCDEX records an Overall Score of 9.3 (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3), compared with Tiger Brokers at 6.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.4, Brand: 7.2, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do SCDEX and Tiger Brokers differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine], while Tiger Brokers lists Stock trading, asset management, wealth management, investor education with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SCDEX or Tiger Brokers?
SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tiger Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.