1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Uphold wallet vs Web3 Builders: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Uphold wallet (Uphold wallet) and Web3 Builders (Web3 Builders) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- Uphold wallet 6D Score
- 2.0
- Web3 Builders 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 4 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Uphold wallet outranks Web3 Builders by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Uphold wallet holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Web3 Builders holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Uphold wallet | Web3 Builders | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Uphold wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Uphold wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Uphold wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Uphold wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | Uphold wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Uphold wallet vs Web3 Builders
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Uphold wallet | Web3 Builders |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Uphold wallet | Web3 Builders |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | United States New York | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Move, convert, hold and trade any form of currency or commodity | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Uphold wallet and Web3 Builders against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Uphold wallet vs Web3 Builders
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Uphold wallet or Web3 Builders?
Uphold wallet holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, Uphold wallet maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (MSC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Web3 Builders maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Uphold wallet and Web3 Builders?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Uphold wallet records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Web3 Builders at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Uphold wallet and Web3 Builders differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Uphold wallet lists Move, convert, hold and trade any form of currency or commodity with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Web3 Builders lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Uphold wallet or Web3 Builders?
Uphold wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Web3 Builders carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.