1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Uphold wallet vs Yesbit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Uphold wallet (Uphold wallet) and Yesbit (Yesbit Technology LTD.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: United States and Canada
- Uphold wallet 6D Score
- 2.0
- Yesbit 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 4 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Yesbit outranks Uphold wallet by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Uphold wallet holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Yesbit holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Uphold wallet | Yesbit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Yesbit |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Yesbit |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Yesbit |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Yesbit |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Uphold wallet vs Yesbit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Uphold wallet | Yesbit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Uphold wallet | Yesbit Technology LTD. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | United States New York | 5255 Yonge St, North York, Ontario, Canada M2N4P6 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Move, convert, hold and trade any form of currency or commodity | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Uphold wallet and Yesbit against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: united states and canada slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Uphold wallet vs Yesbit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Uphold wallet or Yesbit?
Uphold wallet holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, Uphold wallet maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (MSC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Yesbit maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Uphold wallet and Yesbit?
In AlphaPulse Finance's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Uphold wallet records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Yesbit at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Uphold wallet and Yesbit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Uphold wallet lists Move, convert, hold and trade any form of currency or commodity with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Yesbit lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Uphold wallet or Yesbit?
Uphold wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Yesbit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.